February 22, 2009

Calling All Pilots and General Aviation Supporters

LASP.jpgLast year your help was needed to try and put a halt on the implementation of users fees. Now you are needed to once again write your representatives and share your feedback with the government officials over the TSA's proposed Large Aircraft Security Program (LASP).

Max Trescott wrote a great post explaining why this should be the number one aviation issue on your mind this weekend. According to the Aircraft Owners and Pilot Association "The proposed Large Aircraft Security Program, or LASP, would impose a whole range of expensive and burdensome requirements on Part 91 operators of aircraft weighing more than 12,500 lbs. Those requirements include criminal history record checks for crew members, matching passengers to TSA watch and no-fly lists, checking passengers and baggage for dangerous weapons or prohibited items, and paying for biennial third-party audits".

Please don't assume that because this does not effect the type of aircraft you fly that this is not a serious issue for you to be concerned about. AOPA's VP of Government Affairs Andy Cebula makes a great point saying "We're also concerned that the regulations could easily be expanded to include all aircraft, regardless of size or type of operation, because the TSA hasn't said anything to justify the 12,500-lb limit."

Max Trescott referenced a very appropriate quote from Benjamin Franklin in his post on this matter "He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither." What concerns me is that there is not validation of any of the alleged security benefits.

You have until February 27, 2009 to share your comments on the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). There have been nearly 3,000 comments posted thus far, but that is a fraction of the aviation community.

So, I urge you to read Max Trescott's post on the matter and visit AOPAs online member action center. Than take a few minutes to craft a message to share with your representative and submit a formal response to the notice of proposed rulemaking. If you need help figuring out just what to say write AOPA's guide to writing your response to this issue.

Posted by at February 22, 2009 10:39 AM
Comments

i believe in you cause thank for sharing it more people should be concerned for the safety of everyone not just us

Posted by: zylhuette at March 19, 2009 7:46 PM | Reply

That franklin quote isn't quite right. His actual quote is a bit more forgiving: They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.

That said, the LASP rules probably still would violate his sensibilities.

Posted by: rw2 at May 4, 2009 7:43 PM | Reply

yeah, safety of everyone is a must in every airlines and everybody must concerned for their safety. thanks for useful information.

Posted by: Gulfstream Aerospace G Iv at May 5, 2009 3:02 AM | Reply

Post a comment